
I’m thinking about doing a Top Five noir films starring Humphrey Bogart, so I did a little searching. The trouble with film noir is there are no real clear definitions. Unlike westerns or action films, the dividing lines between, say, a crime thriller and a film noir are pretty nebulous. So I wanted to make a list of all the noirs Bogart had starred in. One of the sites I found mentioned this film, so I gave it a watch.
I definitely would not call it a noir, so I’m not counting it for Noirvember, but I thought I’d talk about it a little bit anyway. Bogart was originally credited in eighth place, but the film was rereleased in 1949 as Call It Murder, after he’d become a star, and he then received top billing.
It is more of a morality play than a film noir or even a good movie. A woman kills her husband and is caught and convicted for it. There is speculation she’ll get off as she’s a woman and it was a crime of passion, but the foreman of the jury, Edward Weldon (OP Heggie), pushes for a guilty verdict and gets it. She’s sentenced to die.
There is some publicity and public support for the convicted woman, including from Weldon’s daughter, Stella (Sidney Fox.) She met Gar Boni (Bogart) at the trial, and in the ensuing weeks she’s fallen in love. I think he had some connection to the convicted girl, but I’m honestly not sure. He definitely is supportive of her not dying and convinces Stella to feel the same.
Anyway, the bulk of the film takes place on the day of the execution. Friends and family have gathered at Weldon’s house, and they spend a lot of time talking about the trial. He is unmoved. He stands by his decision to convict and notes that it was not his decision that she get the death penalty, but that is the law.
Before the film ends, something will happen to challenge that idea. I won’t spoil it, but you’ll probably figure it out before it actually happens. I know I did. There isn’t much to the filmmaking. It very much feels like a filmed play, which is pretty much what it is. There is no style to it. Nothing opens it up cinematically. They don’t even use a musical score, which is really weird. Music really does add so much to a film like this.
Bogart’s role is small but pivotal. He’s fine in it, but not particularly memorable. At this point in his career, he was playing a lot of heavies who were a long way from getting top billing. He’s really the only reason to watch this. Otherwise it would have been completely forgotten (and it’s hardly remembered despite his presence).
It’s funny because I have this idea of doing what I call “Now Watching” articles. The idea of those being that sometimes I watch a film but don’t really want to do a full review of it, but I would like to at least mention the watching. So I post the title of the film, the director and stars, and then a little synopsis. My review is typically just a couple of paragraphs, and then I’m done. It is a fun, fast way of keeping track of my movie watching while also reminding me of what I thought.
I had intended this to be one of those, and then I just kept writing. So I guess I’m calling this a full review 🙂
