Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut

slaughterhouse five

On February 13 and 14, 1945 US and British troops firebombed the non-military German city of Dresden, killing somewhere between 35,000 and 135,000 civilians. In 1969 Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. wrote about his experience as a prisoner of war in Dresden during the bombings in Slaughterhouse Five. It is a beautiful, hilarious, bizarre, horrifying novel. Or your average Kurt Vonnegut book.

It is a true Vonnegut novel in that it isn’t straight fiction. Who else would write a novel about a firebombing that includes a time-traveling, alien abducted, hero that barely says a word about the actual firebombing? In his introduction, the author describes how it took him several years to be able to write his Dresden book. He visits fellow witnesses, drinks lots of booze, and generally has a rough time of it. Then he proceeds to tell us exactly how his story begins and the words that conclude the novel. It is as if the narrative itself isn’t important, but rather its underlying themes and ideas.

The narrative itself involves Billy Pilgrim, a bumbling, incompetent replacement soldier. He started the war as a priest’s assistant but finds himself being moved closer to the front. He doesn’t manage to get far before he is captured by the Germans, and sent to Dresden. Mixed in with this simple narrative is Pilgrim’s abduction by aliens and his ability to travel through time, albeit without any type of control. The novel weaves through periods of Pilgrim’s life. From the war, to what would be called the present, to the future where he spends his time in an alien zoo making love to a dirty movie star. This is dusted with a dry philosophy that time is meaningless and individual destiny is a myth. What happens happens, and so it goes.

It is a breezy, novel written in a seemingly stream-of-conscience style. But one shouldn’t let the novel’s ease of reading confuse it with a simple throw-away novel. No, Vonnegut obviously spent a great deal of time and skill crafting a novel that is deceptively simple, yet serves a thick plate of ideas. It is written in the third person from Vonnegut’s own point of view. Several times the author stops and lets us know that the character he has just described, or quoted is, in fact, himself.

The firebombing of Dresden itself is given but few details. We see the bombing as Vonnegut himself did, from underground in a shelter. The little we do see is the aftermath, the rubble and destruction. But the massacre is never far from the author’s lips. While detailing the adventures of Billy Pilgrim, whether marching with fellow soldiers, en route to Dresden via putrid trains or sitting naked on an alien planet, we see the end, we can almost smell the charred masses after the bombing.

It is an anti-war novel that doesn’t wear its position on its sleeve. There are many moments of laugh-out-loud hilarity. It is read so fluidly that it is hard to stop during the more poignant moments to feel the sting of emotion. There are no gung-ho moments of war bravado. There are no heroes to be found in the novel, and as Vonnegut says in the introduction, “There are almost no characters in this story, and almost no dramatic confrontations, because most of the people in it are so sick, and so much the listless playthings of enormous forces. One of the main effects of war, after all, is that people are discouraged from being characters…” It does give us a moving portrait of your average soldier fighting a war he doesn’t understand, seeing atrocities he cannot comprehend. Yet somehow he (and we) are supposed to continue living our lives as atrocious massacres are somehow normal, acceptable things.

And so it goes.

4 thoughts on “Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut

  1. Dear Midnightcafe,
    I think that you have been drinking too many caffeinated beverages to find this story so impressive. Since I am still very young, some of the messages and story lines may have been over my head, but I believe that this story is not at all what you reported.
    The disappointment for me started early. After reading the summary of the book on the back, I was led to believe that it was going to be action packed with stories about the firebombing at Dresden, but I was proven to be very wrong. The story revolved around the fact that the author was in Dresden during the firebombing, but he never really went into great detail about the actual event. He even strayed far away from reality to talk about being abducted by aliens and being imprisoned in their zoo. The book turned out to be more science fiction than historical. Perhaps the alien theme was meant to be a message for his supposed anti-war theme, but I just found it to be distracting and odd.
    I found many other distractions throughout this story. The biggest one I would say was the authors over use of the phrase “so it goes”. He used it at such random points that I thought it took away from the story and unnecessary.
    I respect that, in literature, we are all entitled to our own opinions, but mine couldn’t be any further away from yours. I’m sure that this author is a very good writer; I just believe it wasn’t one of his best. Perhaps as I get older, I will acquire a taste for café beverages. I will then reread this book and maybe then it will have a whole new meaning.

    Sincerely,

    Charles Sigtech

    1. Respectable opinion, but you must be like seven or eight years old if you think that caffeine gives you different opinions on books? Where the hell did you come up with that?

Leave a reply to Jacob Lamson Cancel reply