Naked Alibi (1954) Blu-ray Review

naked alibi bluray

In my review of Naked Alibi which was written for Cinema Sentries back in 2019 I noted that Gloria Grahame was “…one of those actresses I’ve seen in numerous films, but never remember. Whenever she appears in a movie I’m watching, I’m always glad because I know it is going to be a good performance. But then when it’s over I forget who she is. After watching her in this, I think she’ll stick.”

She absolutely did stick. She’s one of the great femme fatales of film noir history and I’m a huge fan.

This film is a good one too, you can read my full review here.

Some Like It Hot Is The 4K UHD Pick of the Week

image host

It is a nice week in new releases. There is a very cool looking set of French thrillers from Radiance Films, a new Film Noir boxed set from Kino Lorber (I’ll have that review ready later this week) a ridiculous 1980s slasher in UHD, a very fun Gena Davis/Samuel L. Jackson thriller and of course one of the funniest movies ever made gettting the HD Criterion treatment.. Click here to see all the info you need.

The Awesome ’80s in April: Highlander (1986)

image host

More so than any of my other themes I find that I wind up talking about my experience with the movies during Awesome 80s in April rather than reviewing them. I grew up in the 1980s. I watched a lot of movies during that decade and continued to watch them on home video through the 1990s and beyond. More than any other decade I have watch movies from the 1980s.

I also remember hearing about a lot of the movies in the 1980s. I remember watching trailers growing up, or hearing about films from Siskel and Ebert, reading reviews in the local paper, etc. These things are implanted in my memory, even for movies I’ve never seen.

So when I watch the now, those memories linger. You’ll find that in these reviews I’ll spend a lot of time talking about watching them as a kid, or at least knowing about them in some way. Sometimes it will be just a memory of seeing the VHS cover a thousand times while browsing for something else to watch.

So it was with Highlander. I didn’t watch the film when it came out in 1986. I was too young. I didn’t watch it in high school or even college. But I was very aware of it. In this case I don’t remember watching trailers or hearing buzz about it as a kid. But later people talked about it being one of the great fantasy movies of all time.

When I finally did see it, probably twenty years ago or so, I was disappointed in it. I didn’t really like it and I didn’t understand why people loved it so.

Watching it again now I both understand the hype and my trepidation over it. It has a cool concept. Some great music. Some beautiful shots. A wonderfully ridiculous performance from Clancy Brown. But Christopher Lambert in the lead doesn’t work for me. The mythology isn’t fleshed out very well. And the staging of most of the action is just bad.

The Highlander is Connor MacLeod (Lambert) an immortal living a simple life as an antiques dealer in New York in 1985. Our film begins with him watching a wrestling match in Madison Square Garden. Bored, he leaves before the match is over only to be attacked by some rando in the parking garage. They fight with swords and MacLeod beheads the other dude.

Flashback to the Scottish Highlands in the 1500s and MacLeod is living a simple life as a farmer or whatever Scottish villagers were in the 1500s. His clan fights another clan. The Kurgan (Brown) is another immortal, but badass and evil. He’s fighting for the other clan. But really he just wants to kill MacLeod because when one immortal beheads the other he gains the dead guys powers or something.

Kurgan gives MacLeod a good stabbing but is unable to behead him. The thing is MacLeod at this time doesnt’ know he’s immortal. Nor do any of his clan. They have a funeral and everything. But then MacLeod wakes up, definitely not dead, and freaks everybody out.

He’s banished and eventually meets Juan Sánchez-Villalobos Ramírez (Sean Connery) a good guy immortal who teaches McLeod in the immortal ways of living, fighting, and not dying.

There are a bunch of immortals on Earth and the only way to kill them is the beheading. Every once in a while these guys get a tingling and that means they gotta come together and try to kill each other. Someday there will be a great tingling and everybody will gather together and fight until the there is only one immortal standing. That guy will get all the power and become God or something. They very much like saying “There Can Be Only One” right before they try and kill each other. It is unclear why they need to kill each other. They don’t always as MacLeod and Ramírez become friends. And later MacLeod will hang out with another immortal and they definitely don’t try and kill each other. So maybe its just the evil guy who likes killing.

It is all kind of vague and nonsensical if you ask me. I don’t think the writers spent a lot of time working the details of the mythology out. There are sequels and a TV show so maybe it makes more sense later on.

The film moves back and forth between the 1980s where MacLeod has to fight the Kurgan again, but also makes a lady friend, and deals with the police over the decapitated dead guy from the garage, and the past where he gets all his training and stuff.

The film looks great. The Scottish scenery is stunningly beautiful and cinematographer Gerry Fisher gives the modern stuff a cool noirish feel with lots of shadows, backlighting, and fluid camera movement.

Christopher Lambert is stiff as MacLeod, never making me believe anything that happening to me. But Clancy Brown is clearly having a lot of fun while Sean Connery does his best Sean Connery. He’s playing an Egyptian who has been living as a Spaniard but he’s still got Connery’s very Scottish accent. I’ll take that over Lamber’s attempt at Scottish. In the modern scenes he’s doing something like German for some reason.

The fight scenes are poorly choreographed and terribly shot. It is hard to believe the same crew who creates such interesting images in all the other scenes managed to screw up the many fight scenes so badly. But here we are.

But that Queen soundtrack rocks.

So what we’re left with is an interesting mythology poorly told and some very pretty images. That’s enough to make me recommend it, but not enough to make me want to dive into the sequels.

The Totally Awesome ’80s in April: 2025 Edition

princess bride movie poster

I feel like I’ve been a bit remiss in my movie theme watching (and writing) this year. I don’t know why exactly except that I’ve been busy. Busy with work. Busy with family stuff. Busy watching (and writing) about movies for Cinema Sentries. I thought that giving up on my music blog would give me more time to write for this one. And it has to an extent, but I seem to be posting more about things that aren’t a part of the month’s them than are.

It is also difficult to get into that groove. For so long I posted music everyday it had become a habit. I’m still working on making this blog a habit.

Which brings us to the Totally Awesome ’80s in April. This will be my third year with this theme and I’m excited about it. Historically I do really well with it. Since it tackles an entire decade and not a specific genre it is much easier to find movies to watch. I especially love the 1980s because I grew up in that decade and have a ton of memories watching movies as a kid, but also because there are a ton of movies geared towards adults that I didn’t watch.

It has been really fun to dive into a lot of those movies these last two years and watch films that would not have interested me as a pre-teen.

I’ve already watched three movies from the 1980s this weekend and I should have some reviews posted this coming week.

Now that’s what I call awesome.

The Friday Night Horror Movie: Companion (2025)

image host

I sometimes think about how a movie’s marketing is at odds with the movie they are supposed to be supporting. It is a common complaint that movie trailers spoil the movies. Most trailers do seem to give away too much plot, and sometimes they will give away a film’s big twist.

But I also think about the ways in which filmmakers make movies with tension and twists. When watching a thriller you pretty much know that the hero isn’t going to die and yet movies often ratchet up the tension making you “believe” that they will. Other times a movie will be about something – something they have to know will be revealed in the marketing as it is central to the reason anyone would want to watch it – yet they will dole it out like a big reveal.

Companion is like that. And it is here that I have to say *spoilers ahead* I guess.

The main character in Companion is a robot, or a “fuck bot” as one character calls her. She is a lifelike android programmed for love and sex. Her name is Iris and she’s wonderfully played by Sophie Thatcher.

If you’ve seen a trailer for the movie then you know this. If you have read even the most basic synopsis of the film you know this. Hell, if you have seen the poster for the film you probably know this.

It isn’t really even a big twist. It isn’t like Alien where the reveal of a character being an android changes everything. Iris being a robotic companion is kind of central to the entire film.

And yet for the first twenty minutes or so the film makes out like she’s real. We see her and her boyfriend/owner Josh (Jack Quaid) hold hands and talk sweet. We see her memories of their meet cute. She’s nervous about spending the weekend with his friends, afraid they won’t like her. Etc. It seems like they are a real couple, like she is a real human. But also something is off. The filmmaking has an ominous tone. At least one character makes a winking comment about who she really is.

And then they reveal she’s a robot as if it is a bit surprise.

This isn’t really a complaint. I don’t mind the way they rolled out that reveal and if you managed to see the film completely blind it might be a fun surprise. I just find that kind of thing fascinating from a marketing point of view as it would be difficult to make a trailer of this film without spoiling that aspect of it.

There are other surpsrises in store for the audience later in the film. Ones I found quite interesting and won’t spoil. Let’s just say things turn a bit dark and violent.

Using a female companion robot as a way to discuss misogyny isn’t new. I was reminded of last year’s Subservience quite a lot with this film. Companion doesn’t have anything particularly interesting to say about the subject either.

Yet I still quite enjoyed the film. It has that slick quality a lot of modern horror films have. It feels pre-packaged in a way, like it was built by a corporation and not a filmmaker with a singular vision. It is very well made. The acting is good. The script does a nice job of balancing the horror, the action, and the comedy. The characters all seem sort of self aware and say things like “You’re an emotional support robot that fucks.” and Josh’s pet name for Iris is Beep Boop.

I enjoyed myself, but in a week I’ll struggle to recall anything about it.

Some Pickups

image host

A couple of days ago, my wife went shopping. This is not unusual; she likes to shop. This particular day, she went to a store called Ollies. It is one of those big discount stores that buys all kinds of random stuff in bulk and then sells it cheaply.

She texted me a couple of photos. They had some comics for sale. I wasn’t interested in most of them, but some Batman comics looked interesting. As well as a few others.

I was cooking lunch at the time, a hamburger. Knowing she was currently at the store I knew I had to make a decision quickly. I did a little searching, looking for reviews of the books, and told her I wanted a couple of them. Then she texted me more photos. And then more. I burnt my burger.

I searched for some more. Sometimes I just looked at my own list to make sure I didn’t currently own the books she was sending. I narrowed it down to a few Batman comics and was all set.

Then she sent me a picture of Bob Dylan. He was young in the pictures, all fresh-faced and curly-haired. But there was no title to it. You can see the book I’m talking about above, but the one she sent me didn’t have the insert photo with the book’s title.

I’m trying to make it a mystery but the title is already spoiled. It is Bob Dylan: Mixing Up the Medicine, a book about the Bob Dylan Center in Tulsa. It comes with all sorts of essays about Dylan and some wonderful photos and descriptions of many of the thousands of items currently residing at the Center.

I’ve been to the Bob Dylan Center and it is awesome. It is also crammed full of stuff. More than I could really take in during my visit. The book will allow me to really dig into so much of what is there, and will no doubt make me visit it again soon.

I’ve seen the book advertised many times and always wanted to buy it, but it retails for $75 which is a bit out of my price range. My wife got it for $20.

I can’t wait to dig in.

The Movie Journal: March 2025

image host

I watched 27 films in March. 17 of those were new to me. 9 of them were made before I was born. The theme for this month was Western in March and I watched five westerns.

As I mentioned last month I’ve been intentionally slowing down my movie watching. I’m watching more TV shows and trying to read more. I’ve been writing for this blog more and doing other things as well. It pains me a little when I see that my numbers are down so much, but I’ll get over that.

My daughter is just starting to get into horror movies so we watched Ready or Not, and Happy Death Day together. I love that.

There continues to be not much to say in terms of my actors and directors lists. No one has really stood out just yet.

imgbox

imgbox

I’ll have more to say about this in a few days but I do plan on watching every movie Martin Scorsese has directed and talking about them. I’ve not yet decided on a name for that series, but I’m pretty excited about it.

Until then here is the full list.

Sadie McKee (1934) ***
Killers of the Flower Moon (2023) ****1/2
Holland (2025) *1/2
Hit Man (1972) **1/2
To the Devil a Daughter (1976) ***1/2
The Monkey (2025) ****
XX: Beautiful Hunter (1994) ***
Neo Chinpira: Zoom Goes the Bullet (1990) ***
Howl’s Moving Castle (2004) *****
Crime Hunter – Bullets of Rage (1989) ***1/2
Hatari! (1962) ***1/2
Maniac (2012) ***
Black Bag (2025) ****
Buchanan Rides Alone (1958) ****
Day of the Outlaw (1959) ****
A Reason to Live, a Reason to Die (1972) ***1/2
The Land That Time Forgot (1974) ***1/2
Galaxy of Terror (1981) ***
The French Connection (1971) ****
Delicatessen (1991) ****
Venom (1981) ***1/2
A Fish Called Wanda (1988) ****
Happy Death Day (2017) ****
Trick or Treat (1986) ***1/2
Heathers (1989) ****
Ready or Not (2019) ****
Hombre (1967) ****

A Complete Unknown is the New Blu-ray Pick of the Week

image host

People keep asking me what I thought of A Complete Unknown. I love movies. I’m a huge fan of Bob Dylan. It seems like a no-brainer of a question. Trouble is I still haven’t seen the film.

Truth is I just don’t care for biopics, especially ones that cover ground I’m already familiar with. I’m quite familiar with this part of Bob Dylan’s life, I don’t need to see a fictionalized version of it.

I’m sure I’ll watch it at some point. It got good reviews and Edward Norton’s portrayal of Pete Seeger was highly praised. But I’m in no hurry about it. I suppose now that it is getting a Blu-ray release I may find time for it.

Also out this week that looks interesting:

Companion: This robotic companion goes murderously haywire horror film stars Sophie Thatcher who I’ve been enjoying on Yellowjackets.

Mufasa: The Lion King: Normally I wouldn’t bother mentioning these dumb Disney “live-action” remake/reboot/rewhatevers of classic films. But this one was directed by Barry Jenkins so it is probably worth a look.

Love Hurts: Ke Huy Quan stars in this dude with a shady past is pulled back into it action/drama. The reviews have been terrible, but I love Ke Huy Quan so I’ll give it a look.

Mabuse Lives!: Fritz Lang made a couple of Dr. Mabuse films in the early part of his career. Thirty years later he was asked to make a sequel. It was a success and so several more were made. Eureka Entertainment has boxed these late sequels all up. The films include: The Thousand Eyes of Dr. Mabuse, The Return of Dr. Mabuse, The Invisible Dr. Mabuse, The Testament of Dr. Mabuse, Scotland Yard Hunts Dr. Mabuse, and The Death Ray of Dr. Mabuse.

Westerns In March: Killers of the Flower Moon (2023)

killers of the flower moon poster

In 2019 HBO released an excellent series called Watchmen. It was not an adaptation of the groundbreaking comic of the same name by Alan Moore but it was set in that universe. The series opens with a depiction of the Tulsa Race Massacre, a historic event in which a group of white men burnt an affluent black neighborhood to the ground after a black man had been accused of assaulting a white woman.

The internet was abuzz about the episode because most of the United States had never heard of the massacre. I grew up in Oklahoma, not thirty miles from Tulsa. I had heard of the massacre but never studied it in school. I believe my Oklahoma History textbooks included the event, but it was never discussed in class. If I’m being generous I’d say that was because we covered the state’s history in chronological order, and we didn’t have time to get that far into it before the school year was up.

I was completely unaware of the Osage Indian Murders until David Gran’s book Killers of the Flower Moon was released in 2017. It makes one wonder how much of our history has been whitewashed or completely erased. Considering what is currently happening in the United States I fear even more will disappear before too long.

Martin Scorsese adapted the book in 2023. My hometown was buzzing with the news of the filming and I tried multiple times to become an extra in it, to no avail. There were Facebook groups that breathlessly reported on every day’s shootings and multiple people showed up every day taking blurry photos of the film’s stars Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert DeNiro, and Lily Gladstone.

I could not wait to see the film. I caught it opening weekend at Tulsa’s wonderful independent movie house the Circle Cinema. I loved it. It was one of my favorite movies of 2023. I’ve been meaning to watch it again ever since. But it is a long movie and I just now got around to it.

After years of being kicked around the Osage were finally settled on a hard-scrabble chunk of worthless land in North West Oklahoma. It was literally land that no one wanted.

Then they discovered oil.

Amazingly the Osage were able to retain their rights to the land and maintained what were known as headrights. This allowed them to keep their land whilst giving the oil companies the right to drill underneath it. In return, the oil companies gave the Osage regular payments. This made them some of the richest people per capita in the world. For a time.

As it is their way, white men quickly found ways to cheat the Osage out of their money. The government created a system in which Osage could be declared incompetent, allowing white men to oversee their money and decide how it was spent. Naturally, they found ways of spending that money for themselves. Corruption was rampant. A great many Osage were declared incompetent for ridiculous reasons. I read that at least one woman was declared incompetent because she wasn’t spending enough of her money, and therefore didn’t understand its value. Plenty of white folks moved into the area selling goods and services at ridiculously high rates.

And then they started murdering the Osage. At least 60 full-blood Osage were killed between 1918-1931. Killers of the Flower Moon focuses in on one conspiracy led by William King Hale (Robert DeNiro) and his nephew Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio).

As this is already long I’m gonna skip most of the plot details. The basics involve Ernest marrying an Osage woman named Mollie (Lily Gladstone) whose family owns a fortune in headlights. Led by King Hale, Ernest hires various other men to murder most of Mollie’s family pushing more and more money into his control. By the end, he’s poisoning Mollie by adding something nefarious to her daily insulin injections.

It is a horrific, true story about racism, white supremacy, and greed.

The book it is based on is plotted like a murder mystery. We don’t know who is responsible for the murders until the end. It is also a story about the burgeoning Bureau of Investigation, a precursor to the F.B.I.

Originally Scoresese’s movie was going to follow in those same tracks. It would be a mystery, and DiCaprio was set to play the F.B.I. man. but along the way, they realized this was really a story of the Osage. But Scorsese, a rich, white, Catholic Italian from New York is smart enough to realize he is not the person who can truly tell their story. At the same time his privilege as a rich white man, and a decorated director at that, allows him to tell such a tale. In all likelihood, an Osage filmmaker would never be given the funding to make it.

You can feel that tension throughout the film. Scorsese took great pains to consult with many Osage tribespeople, trying to be respectful of their culture and tell their story as best he could. But he also centers it on Ernest, he tells it from his perspective. At the end of the film, Scorsese does something that directly indicates that this is a story told by a white man. Stories like this are important to tell, but we should always be aware of who is telling them.

DiCaprio is brilliant as Ernest. He’s not a particularly intelligent man. To put it bluntly, he’s an idiot. And easily manipulated. King Hale regularly talks him into doing his bidding. There is a question at the heart of the film about whether Ernest loves his wife. I think he does. Of a sort. In DiCaprio’s performance we see him genuinely care for her. Yet he also loves money. On multiple occasions he literally states this. At one point he declares he loves money almost as much as he loves his wife.

I think he is able to compartmentalize the horrible things he is doing and separate them from his feelings for Mollie. He’s also a blatant racist. So killing Native Americans is no big deal to him. Killing Mollie’s sisters is just killing some more Osage and that’s okay. The fact that they are Mollie’s kin, that she loves them, and that their deaths pain her is somehow separated in his mind.

We eventually see some regret rise up in him. He’s willing to poison Mollie because that will “slow her down” and keep her from discovering the truth. But slowly he realizes he’s killing her. Slowly he sees the effect all this murdering has on her. I mean, he’s still a horrible human, but just slightly better than King Hale who has no remorse at all.

Lily Gladstone is nothing short of brilliant. She doesn’t have a lot of lines, but she makes every scene count. Watch her face and notice how she’s hiding her emotions and thoughts, but look closely and you can see everything underneath. It is a subtle, fantastic performance.

This has grown too long. The film is long. At 3.5 hours you have to have patience with it. It isn’t a perfect film, that tension between the story that needs to be told and the one that Scorsese is able to tell sometimes falls on the wrong side. But it is a great film. One that tells a hugely important story in meaningful ways.

The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three (1974) Blu-ray Review

taking of pelham one two three

As a kid I knew Walter Matthau from silly comedies like Grumpy Old Men and The Odd Couple, it was only later in life that realized he was a very fine actor indeed. He generally stayed in the comedic lane, but once in a while, he’d take on something more dramatic.

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three is a terrifically taut little thriller about some dudes hijacking a New York Subway car. Matthau plays a transit cop trying to catch them. It is a wonderful encapsulation of New York in the 1970s.

You can read my full review here.