Now Watching: One Battle After Another (2025)

image host

One Battle After Another (2025)
Director: Paul Thomas Anderson
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Sean Penn, Benicio Del Toro, and Chase Infiniti

When their evil enemy resurfaces after 16 years, a group of ex-revolutionaries reunite to rescue one of their own’s daughter.

Rating: 8/10

I’ve been hearing raves about this film, and I really wanted to see it in a theater, so when I got off work a little early today, I went to a matinee. The show started at 3, and I arrived about 7 minutes till. I bought my ticket and my snacks (Junior Mints and a Dr. Pepper – a rarity for me, as my wife always makes me get popcorn).

The guy behind the counter told me the theater number, but I didn’t pay him much mind, as they have posters up in front of each entrance. I wandered down the hall one way, then the other, and finally found my theater.

It was completely empty. Surprisingly, they didn’t have any commercials or trailers playing on the screen. It was completely dark. I figured since I was the only one there and I had just bought my ticket, they weren’t bothering with the usual pre-movie nonsense.

Time passed, and soon it was five minutes past three. Then ten. Still no movie. And it was hot. I was literally starting to sweat. I got up and went back to the guy who sold me the ticket. I politely explained the movie wasn’t running and asked if he could turn down the air. He said he’d tell his manager, and I went back and sat down.

Another five minutes rolled by, and now I’m getting annoyed. The movie is a long one, and I don’t want to be here all night.

Then the guy comes in. He sheepishly says he’s figured out the problem. I’m in the wrong theater. Those posters in front of the entrance are digital displays, and they’ve got them all wrong. It is now fifteen minutes past the hour, and I’m afraid I’ve missed the start of the movie. I curse, then rush to the correct theater. Luckily, they are still showing previews, and I’m good to go.

Paul Thomas Anderson is a director I really like, but I find his films difficult at first watch. They are usually long and dense, and their points of view are off-kilter, which can make them difficult to grasp.

I usually have to sit with them for a while and then maybe watch again before I decide to really love them.

And so it was with One Battle After Another. I liked it a lot, but I’m not ready to love it. I need to think about it for a bit.

Leonardo DiCaprio is very good as a former revolutionary who seems to have really gotten into it for a girl and who isn’t all that bright. Years after a big dustup between his group and a racist Army dude (played to perfection by Sean Penn) pass, and he’s now a slack-jawed stoner trying to raise a teenage girl. The Sean Penn character comes back into the picture, and things get wild.

Really wild. The name is apt because this is a film that very rarely lets up. The performances are all top-notch, and there is plenty of black humor, crazy absurdities, and more. I really did like it, but like I said, I need to sit with it a bit.

As the title of this post implies, I’m back with the idea of writing little mini-reviews of all the movies I watch. Let’s see how long I keep up with it this time.

Westerns In March: Killers of the Flower Moon (2023)

killers of the flower moon poster

In 2019 HBO released an excellent series called Watchmen. It was not an adaptation of the groundbreaking comic of the same name by Alan Moore but it was set in that universe. The series opens with a depiction of the Tulsa Race Massacre, a historic event in which a group of white men burnt an affluent black neighborhood to the ground after a black man had been accused of assaulting a white woman.

The internet was abuzz about the episode because most of the United States had never heard of the massacre. I grew up in Oklahoma, not thirty miles from Tulsa. I had heard of the massacre but never studied it in school. I believe my Oklahoma History textbooks included the event, but it was never discussed in class. If I’m being generous I’d say that was because we covered the state’s history in chronological order, and we didn’t have time to get that far into it before the school year was up.

I was completely unaware of the Osage Indian Murders until David Gran’s book Killers of the Flower Moon was released in 2017. It makes one wonder how much of our history has been whitewashed or completely erased. Considering what is currently happening in the United States I fear even more will disappear before too long.

Martin Scorsese adapted the book in 2023. My hometown was buzzing with the news of the filming and I tried multiple times to become an extra in it, to no avail. There were Facebook groups that breathlessly reported on every day’s shootings and multiple people showed up every day taking blurry photos of the film’s stars Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert DeNiro, and Lily Gladstone.

I could not wait to see the film. I caught it opening weekend at Tulsa’s wonderful independent movie house the Circle Cinema. I loved it. It was one of my favorite movies of 2023. I’ve been meaning to watch it again ever since. But it is a long movie and I just now got around to it.

After years of being kicked around the Osage were finally settled on a hard-scrabble chunk of worthless land in North West Oklahoma. It was literally land that no one wanted.

Then they discovered oil.

Amazingly the Osage were able to retain their rights to the land and maintained what were known as headrights. This allowed them to keep their land whilst giving the oil companies the right to drill underneath it. In return, the oil companies gave the Osage regular payments. This made them some of the richest people per capita in the world. For a time.

As it is their way, white men quickly found ways to cheat the Osage out of their money. The government created a system in which Osage could be declared incompetent, allowing white men to oversee their money and decide how it was spent. Naturally, they found ways of spending that money for themselves. Corruption was rampant. A great many Osage were declared incompetent for ridiculous reasons. I read that at least one woman was declared incompetent because she wasn’t spending enough of her money, and therefore didn’t understand its value. Plenty of white folks moved into the area selling goods and services at ridiculously high rates.

And then they started murdering the Osage. At least 60 full-blood Osage were killed between 1918-1931. Killers of the Flower Moon focuses in on one conspiracy led by William King Hale (Robert DeNiro) and his nephew Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio).

As this is already long I’m gonna skip most of the plot details. The basics involve Ernest marrying an Osage woman named Mollie (Lily Gladstone) whose family owns a fortune in headlights. Led by King Hale, Ernest hires various other men to murder most of Mollie’s family pushing more and more money into his control. By the end, he’s poisoning Mollie by adding something nefarious to her daily insulin injections.

It is a horrific, true story about racism, white supremacy, and greed.

The book it is based on is plotted like a murder mystery. We don’t know who is responsible for the murders until the end. It is also a story about the burgeoning Bureau of Investigation, a precursor to the F.B.I.

Originally Scoresese’s movie was going to follow in those same tracks. It would be a mystery, and DiCaprio was set to play the F.B.I. man. but along the way, they realized this was really a story of the Osage. But Scorsese, a rich, white, Catholic Italian from New York is smart enough to realize he is not the person who can truly tell their story. At the same time his privilege as a rich white man, and a decorated director at that, allows him to tell such a tale. In all likelihood, an Osage filmmaker would never be given the funding to make it.

You can feel that tension throughout the film. Scorsese took great pains to consult with many Osage tribespeople, trying to be respectful of their culture and tell their story as best he could. But he also centers it on Ernest, he tells it from his perspective. At the end of the film, Scorsese does something that directly indicates that this is a story told by a white man. Stories like this are important to tell, but we should always be aware of who is telling them.

DiCaprio is brilliant as Ernest. He’s not a particularly intelligent man. To put it bluntly, he’s an idiot. And easily manipulated. King Hale regularly talks him into doing his bidding. There is a question at the heart of the film about whether Ernest loves his wife. I think he does. Of a sort. In DiCaprio’s performance we see him genuinely care for her. Yet he also loves money. On multiple occasions he literally states this. At one point he declares he loves money almost as much as he loves his wife.

I think he is able to compartmentalize the horrible things he is doing and separate them from his feelings for Mollie. He’s also a blatant racist. So killing Native Americans is no big deal to him. Killing Mollie’s sisters is just killing some more Osage and that’s okay. The fact that they are Mollie’s kin, that she loves them, and that their deaths pain her is somehow separated in his mind.

We eventually see some regret rise up in him. He’s willing to poison Mollie because that will “slow her down” and keep her from discovering the truth. But slowly he realizes he’s killing her. Slowly he sees the effect all this murdering has on her. I mean, he’s still a horrible human, but just slightly better than King Hale who has no remorse at all.

Lily Gladstone is nothing short of brilliant. She doesn’t have a lot of lines, but she makes every scene count. Watch her face and notice how she’s hiding her emotions and thoughts, but look closely and you can see everything underneath. It is a subtle, fantastic performance.

This has grown too long. The film is long. At 3.5 hours you have to have patience with it. It isn’t a perfect film, that tension between the story that needs to be told and the one that Scorsese is able to tell sometimes falls on the wrong side. But it is a great film. One that tells a hugely important story in meaningful ways.

Movie Review: The Aviator (2004)

the aviator poster

I have been a fan of Martin Scorcese since I have been serious about film. His films are intelligent, technically brilliant, and artful. He causes us to meditate on characters we’d rather forget, or shuffle to the back of society and our minds. His movies are often tough, meaty films that take a great deal to work through. His films have never been as popular as contemporaries like Spielberg or Lucas. But he doesn’t seem to mind, nor do his fans. While these other filmmakers soar to the heavens and look for the good in people, Scorcese seems to dig into the trenches and inhabit the rough sticky worlds that inhabit the low lives of troubled men. He seems interested in why people live violent, hurtful lives. He is…well many other people have praised his work far better than I can.

I have seen every Scorcese picture in the theatre since Kundun. Each time I venture into his films I come with high expectations. I know an excellent Scorcese picture is a true treasure, something to behold and love. I was well pleased to see that the Aviator was playing here in France in version originale, or with an English language track.

Scorcese pictures are always a technical marvel. And the aviator does not disappoint in this category. In post-production, he manipulated the colors of the film to mirror the production scales of the time period being represented. In early scenes the colors are “two-tone Technicolor” and then evolve into “three-tone Technicolor” and on to full-scale color by the end of the film. The flight sequences are spectacularly shot. Scorcese is such a master of the technical aspects of filmmaking that he makes even the most difficult shots look easy.

I have been a closet Leonardo DiCaprio fan for many years. It is difficult to admit this in mixed company because of the general distaste for the actor. Since Titanic drove a million adolescents wild, it seems no serious fan of the cinema can admit admiration of the actor (except for people like Steven Spielberg and Scorcese who keep putting him into their pictures). Yet, I continue to find him to be an actor of excellence. He does a marvelous job here, portraying a complex, fascinating human.

Cate Blanchett does a pitch-perfect job as Katherine Hepburn, one of the many Hollywood romances of Howard Hughes. Ms. Hepburn was such a caricature herself, portraying her must have taken plenty of guts. It is a fine, outstanding performance.

Many people carry only a vague notion of Howard Hughes. We know that he was quite rich, lived a glamorous, flashy life as a young man, and became a maniacal hermit in his old age. Pictures of a hunched, old man with long, white hair; an unkept beard; unclipped, yellow toenails, and boxes on his feet come to mind instantly whenever Hughes’ name is mentioned. This is the Howard Hughes we have become fascinated by. Yet this aspect of Hughes’ life is barely dealt with in Scorcese’s picture. Yes, we catch many glimpses of the demons inside him, and we even capture a few weeks of isolation, but mostly Scorcese dwells on the younger man, full of life.

Though Scorcese is often fascinated with eccentric, crazed lives, it is rare for him to give any reason for the lives of his characters. We can tell that loneliness helps to bring Travis Bickel, in Taxi Driver, over the brink. We see greed and violence begetting more violence in films such as Goodfellas and Raging Bull. But these things are only the beginnings of why they behave in such reprehensible ways. Preferring to allow his films to be questions, Scorcese never fully gives us answers. The Aviator, also, gives us hints to what may have driven Howard Hughes to such madness, but it never fully explains his actions. We see hints of a protective mother, and surely his drive to control every aspect of his life helped him become obsessive-compulsive. Yet these things are not answers, more symptoms of the overall problem. Scorcese is more interested in the behavior of his characters. The nuances of their actions, and the subsequent damage it causes. You won’t find cookie cutters to make you feel better about life in this film, but you’ll find a meditation on a brilliant, troubled man. If you care to dig a little deeper, you might be moved.