Pretty Maids All In A Row (1971)

Pretty Maids All in a Blu

When I review discs for Cinema Sentries, it is by request. The owner of the site, Gordon, sends out emails from the PR people noting that they have discs for review. When I want something, I make a request, and if I’m lucky, I get a copy of the disc.

I don’t always know exactly why I request something. Sometimes, it is for a film that I already love and want to own on disc. Sometimes it is for a film that I’ve been wanting to see. More often than not, it is for a film I’ve never heard of, but that sounds interesting. I get a lot of films from Kino Lorber and the Warner Archive that are like that. They usually star actors I really like or are from a director I enjoy. I also often request films from the Criterion Collection or Radiance Films because I know they will be great releases, and usually the films are interesting.

And then there are films like Pretty Maids in a Row. This is a sleazy film about sexy teens getting murdered in a high school. It stars Rock Hudson as a football coach/counselor who’s sleeping with half the student body. Angie Dickinson plays a sexy teacher, and Telly Sevalis is the cop trying to solve the murders. It was written by Gene Roddenberry and directed by Roger Vadim. That’s a lot of talent for a skeezy film. Which I guess is why I requested it.

It isn’t good exactly, but it is a fascinating time capsule into a certain period of Hollywood film. You can read my full review at Cinema Sentries.

Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo (1944)

Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo Blu

Spencer Tracy gets top billing in this World War II epic, but this is really Van Johnson’s film. He plays a fighter pilot who volunteers for a secret mission to bomb Japan just weeks after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The title is apt as the actual bombing raid takes hardly any time at all. The film therefore focuses on the time before, when the men are training for the mission, and the time after, when Van Johnson’s plane is shot down on the Chinese shoreline, and they must find a way to escape to safety.

I wanted to love this film more than I did. Honestly, it is a bit of a drag as the training exercises are dull and the romantic engagements even more so. Things pick up once they crash, but by then I was just ready for the film to be over. You can read my full review at Cinema Sentries.

Now Watching: Deadly Circuit (1983)

deadly circuit poster

Deadly Circuit (1983)
Directed by Claude Miller
Starring Michel Serrault and Isabelle Adjani

Synopsis: A private detective becomes obsessed with a serial killer who he thinks might be his daughter.

Rating: ***1/2

Thoughts: A very French take on the neo-noir. A private detective known as “The Eye” (Serrault) is hired to locate a rich couple’s son and find out more information about the woman he has been seeing.  He finds the man and watches the woman, Catherine (Adjani) murder him. The detective doesn’t turn her in, but continues to follow her, where he finds that she regularly seduces rich men and then murders them. He becomes convinced she is his long-lost daughter and begins secretly helping her dispose of the bodies. 

This is a weird little film that mostly follows the detective as he follows the girl. Serrault is great as the detective. He’s a guy who was once great at his job but has lost his way. As he’s gotten older, he’s feeling the weight of having never known his daughter (what exactly happened to her is only revealed late in the film). Adjani is lovely as well, but Catherine is someone we mostly just see through his eyes. The plot is strange and quirky and kind of wonderful.

A Man Named Rocca (1961) / La Scoumoune (1972)

image host

If you spend any time at all watching French cinema, then you will no doubt know the name Jean-Paul Belmondo. He was one of the great actors of the French New Wave and remained a popular favorite for decades.

In what seems like a very strange turn of events, he wound up starring as the same character in two different adaptations of the same book, some eleven years apart. Kino Lorber has just released them, and I watched them back to back. It is a fascinating glimpse into the adaptation process. I reviewed them both over at Cinema Sentries.

The Movie Journal: June 2026

imgbox

I watched 36 movies in June. 16 of them were made before I was born. 30 of them were new to me. There was no theme this month.

As I’m writing this and adding links to all the reviews I’ve written, I realize I haven’t written as much as I used to. A couple of months back, I made a decision that I wanted to write more about music on this site since this was a music-only site for many years, and some of you have told me you don’t have much interest in movies. Once that decision was made, it was like a little button was pushed in my brain, turning off that demand to write about movies. 

Before that decision was made, I always felt like I needed to write something nearly every day. Movies were the easiest thing to write about since I watch a lot of them.  Having a theme each month also demanded a certain amount of writing. But I clicked that switch, and that feeling of “needing” to write about movies died. I actually do want to write more than I have, but once that button was switched, I immediately found other things to distract me with.  It’s weird.

And yet, the switch to write about music hasn’t quite been turned on either. I do my main music listening in my car, mostly when driving to and from work. I’ve been trying to write about concerts, but they last a couple of hours. My ride to work is about twenty minutes, so it takes me a couple of three days to get a full concert listened to.  Then I want to listen to it a few times before I write anything.  But also, I feel like I need to really listen, and sometimes I’ve got something on my mind.  If I find I’m not really listening, I turn it off. Or sometimes I get a phone call while driving, or something else comes up. So, my music writing takes a lot longer than my movie writing.  I’m working on a better system.

I am still writing about movies, just for Cinema Sentries. So that’s good.

I subscribe to a few different movie streaming services.  We have Prime pretty much always, but we switch back and forth between various others. I usually subscribe to the Criterion Channel, and my wife loves BritBox.  My daughter has recently gotten into anime, so now we have Crunchyroll.  But sometimes we’ll cancel one service and get another one for a month or two. Earlier this year, my daughter really wanted to watch Hamilton, so we subscribed to Disney+ for a month.

Most streaming services offer up pretty good deals on the regular, and I’ve always got my eye out. This month, I got a good deal on the Kino channel and something called Midnight Pulp. Kino is connected to Kino Lorber, a company I get a lot of review Blu-rays from. They have a very nice selection of old movies, and a lot of foreign films. They are similar to Criterion, but whereas Criterion aims for the greatest films ever made, Kino tends to get slightly more obscure films. So I got to watch films like Picpus – a pretty good Maigret film – and A Pain in the Ass – a very funny French film.  

Midnight Pulp is pretty much exactly what it sounds like. They offer up genre films. The time of movies you’d catch at some old midnight movie place, or at the back of your local video store (when there used to be video stores.) They have some terrible films, and a lot of goofy-looking erotica, but I managed to see a terrific Japanese film called Samurai Wolf and Night of the Juggler, which was just wonderful. 

We are at the halfway point of 2026, so I’ll offer up some more statistics. I’ve watched 241 movies this year. I’ve seen 13 films from this year. Dramas are my biggest watched genre, followed by Thrillers, Crime, Action, and Horror. Movies made in the USA got the most views by me followed by the UK, France, Italy, and Japan. 187 or 77 percent of the films I watched were new to me.

imgbox

The big news in the most-watched actors field is that Lino Ventura bounced up to a tie in first place with Tom Baker, Spencer Tracy, and James Stewart (who also moved up one film). Marcel Bozuffie also moved up one film to five. But pretty much everyone else stayed the same.

imgbox

As for directors, Guy Hamilton bumped up a film to three watched, making him tied with a bunch of others for second place. Chloe Zhao is now on the leaderboard, making her the only woman director to place. I should do better about that.

It has been a good year so far. I’ve watched some great movies. Here’s to another six months.

Songs My Brothers Taught Me (2015) ****1/2
Back to the Wall (1958) ****
Speaking of Murder (1957) ***1/2
Obsession (2025) ***1/2
Dead Heat (1988) ***1/2
Supergirl (1984) ***
Rings of Fear (1978) ***
Fright Night Part 2 (1988) ***1/2
Head Against the Wall (1959) ***
Suicide Club (2001) ***
A Pain in the Ass (1973) ****
Samurai Wolf (1966) ****1/2
Night of the Juggler (1980) ****1/2
Picpus (1943) ***1/2
Virtuosity (1995) ***
Doctor Who: The Awakening (1984) ***1/2
The Toxic Avenger (2023) ***
The Narrow Margin (1952) ****
The Mastermind (2025) ****
Deathstalker II: Duel of the Titans (1987) **
Solo (1970) ****
Waves of Lust (1975) **
Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989) *****
The Long Arm (1956) ****
The Intruder (1953) ***1/2
Home at Seven (1952) ***
Fright Night (1985) ***1/2
Aesthetics of a Bullet (1973) **
Deathstalker (1983) **
The Roaring Twenties (1939) ****
A View to a Kill (1985) ***1/2
The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939) ****1/2
Project Hail Mary (2026) ****
Beyond the Door III (1989) ****
Witchboard (1986) *
Backrooms (2026) **1/2

Waves of Lust (1975)

image host

I don’t know why I still watch exploitation movies. I know why I used to watch them – they are filled with exciting action, violence, and naked flesh, but I can get that anywhere now. Certainly in ways that are far better produced and more interesting than what appears in most exploitation flicks.  But when an offer for a film called Waves of Lust appears to me, I immediately say “yes.” 

I guess I’ll always be a sucker for this stuff. You can read my review of the film (which isn’t bad, actually) over at Cinema Sentries.

Solo (1970)

image host

One day I may stop singing the praises of Radiance Films, but today is not that day. I love, love, love the way they keep bringing to my attention films that I’d otherwise never hear of in nice sets, loaded with extras.

Solo is a terrific little French thriller about a couple of young revolutionaries in over their heads and how a jewel thief winds up lending them a hand.  You can read my full review at Cinema Sentries.

The Friday Night Horror Movie: Fright Night (1985)

MV5BMj Qz MTM4Nz Uy M15BMl5Ban Bn Xk Ft ZTgw NDYy ODgw Nz E V1 FMjpg UY2048

I talk a lot about growing up in the 1980s and how the slasher genre helped shape my cinematic aesthetics. I loved the Jasons and the Freddys. But the truth is I watched those films at home, edited on basic cable. It wasn’t until years later that I watched them as intended and in order. But there was another set of horror films that I watched unedited even back when I was a kid. These were, well, not family-friendly as such, but they were more palatable to the grown ups allowing us kids to watch them on videotape.

Films like The Monster Squad (1987), House (1985), and my favorite, Fright Night (1985), fall into the comedy horror genre. They are goofy and silly but still provided some good scares. I loved them as a kid. But once I grew up, I more or less forgot about them.

About fifteen years ago, not long after my daughter was born, I rewatched Fright Night and its sequel. I was a little disappointed in both. They didn’t live up to my nostalgia. But the first one has been popping up in my streaming feeds the last few weeks, and I decided to give it another revisit. I seem to be doing that a lot lately – revisiting film I loved decades ago. Trying to see if they still hold up, I guess.

I liked Fright Night quite a lot this go ’round. It is a film from the 1980s that loves classic horror, and even Hammer-era horror. It is fun, and funny, and makes great use of practical effects, and has some very decent thrills.

Charley Brewster (William Ragsdale) loves old horror movies. He watches them on a local station hosted by Peter Vincent (Roddy McDowall), a Peter Cushing-esque old horror star. Whatever happened to those old shows where they show old movies with introductions by goofy, sexy, creepy, hosts?

We’re introduced to Charley as one of those old movies plays in his bedroom. He’s making out with his girlfriend Amy Peterson (Amanda Bearse), but when it cuts to Peter Vincent talking about one of his movies, she stops with the face sucking to tell Charley he should watch. She knows he’s a huge fan. But he’s got other things on his mind. Mainly losing his virginity. They fight over it a bit, but then she finally agrees, takes off her top, and crawls into bed. But then he notices something strange in the neighbor’s yard. Two men seem to be carrying a coffin inside.

Amy feels increasingly insecure and practically begs him to come to bed. But he’s too fascinated with what’s going on out there. She leaves in a huff, and it is only then that he seems to notice her again.

It is a fascinating way to start the film, as it tells us so much about these characters. He’s desperate to have sex with her. So much so that he doesn’t care about catching his favorite show. A show she is quite aware he loves (thus she cares about him, knowing what he likes) and uses it as an excuse to get his paws off of her for a bit. She becomes vulnerable, admitting that she’s just scared about losing her virginity and is willing to finally lose it with him. But then something real and weird and scary happens outside, and he suddenly forgets all about his girl.

That becomes something of a theme for this film. He’ll periodically declare his undying love to her, but then immediately become distracted by oncoming horror.

Anyway, over the next few days, he sees very attractive women entering the neighbor’s house but never leaving. One night he gets a binoculared view of the new owner, Jerry Dandridge (Chris Sarandon), getting sexy with one of those ladies when suddenly he grows fangs. His new neighbor is a vampire!

He tries to convince Amy and his best friend Evil Ed (Stephen Geoffreys) of this, but they aren’t having it. He tries to enlist Peter Vincent to help him destroy the vampire, but he thinks Charley’s crazy. Vincent’s having a bit of a hard time himself. He used to be an important actor. Or at least he was working. Making cult films. Now he’s hosting a cheesy late-night show for local television. And he’s just learned he’s been fired from that. Because these days “all they want to see are demented madmen running around in ski-masks, hacking up young virgins.”

Amy and Evil Ed convince Peter Vincent to lend them a hand. Not in destroying the vampires but in convincing Charley that he’s mistaken about the whole thing. They figure they can visit Mr. Dandridge, give him a few vampire tests, and all will be well.

But of course, Dandrige is a real vampire, and the tests backfire. Now the gang will have to destroy him for sure, before he turns them into bloodsuckers.

Tom Holland wrote and directed the film, and he does a nice job blending the scares with the laughs. It isn’t really scary (or all that funny if I’m being honest), but I found it quite entertaining. It has a very enjoyable vibe.

The practical effects are terrific. When the monsters die, they die slowly, transforming into goopy, bloody corpses. There is a werewolf transition that rivals the famous one in An American Werewolf in London (1981).

Roddy McDowell is great fun. He plays the pathos of this aging actor perfectly, giving him a wonderful vanity mixed with terror as he realizes that all those monsters he fought on the movie screen are real, and that he doesn’t have near the courage his characters did. Chris Sarandon is a bit miscast in my opinion. He’s clearly having fun, which is infectious, but he doesn’t have nearly the sex appeal or menace a great vampire has.

This isn’t great cinema, but it’s great fun.

Birds of Prey (1968)

image host

Lino Ventura has become one of those actors I keep finding myself watching, almost by accident. He just keeps showing up in the films that I’m watching.  I don’t know why.  But he’s so good I never mind.

In Birds of Prey, he plays a killer hired to assassinate the president of some backwater South American country. Before he can do that, he is forced to wait in a tiny little village for several days, accompanied by a true revolutionary. A kid who will probably replace the president. The kid is idealistic while the killer is old and cynical. Their interactions make up most of the movie, and they are wonderfully played.  The whole movie is great.  You can read my full review at Cinema Sentries.