The Friday Night Horror Movie – Awesome ’80s in April Edition: The Initiation (1984)

the initiation movie poster

The Initiation feels like two different slashers thrown together in a way that does disservice to them both. The first part is a bit of a cliche but it is fun to watch. The other part is also a cliche but it is not fun, a bit of a mess and a kind of a slog.

College girl Kelly Fairchild (Daphne Zuniga) is pledging a sorority and for Hell Night her and her fellow pledges have been tasked with breaking into her father’s enormous department store and stealing the security guard’s clothes.

She’s also been having this terrible recurring nightmare about a strange man being burned alive in her childhood home. Unrelated to her story (or is it? – it definitely is) a man with a burned face breaking out of an insane asylum and starts killing people.

She gets cozy with graduate assistant Peter (James Read) of the psychology department who specializes in dreams. This is the part that’s a slow. He’ll analyze her dream and investigate her past and realize the connection between the dreams and the murders. But as an audience we figure that stuff out pretty quickly so the whole mystery he’s trying to solve isn’t mysterious at all.

The fun part of the film is the group of girls going to the department store and being killed off one by one. The deaths aren’t all that inventive and I’m being generous with the word “fun” here, but it is more more enjoyable to watch than the psychology nonsense.

As a certified horror fan and slasher enthusiast this is very much in my wheelhouse. I love films where characters are trapped in an en closed, but large space and have to face off against something horrible. This certainly doesn’t do anything new with it, and half the plot is a bit of a chore, but there is enough there to satisfy your hard core horror nerds.

The Awesome ’80s In April: Innerspace (1987)

image host

Innerspace was the very first movie I ever saw in Letterboxd.

Quickly, for the few of you who may not know, letterbox is when they put those black bars on the tops and the bottom of the screen. They do that because movies are generally shot in a rectangular aspect ratio that fits the movie theater screen but does not fit the old square TV screens. To make it fit the square TV screen they had to cut off parts of the movie which is called Pan & Scan (pan is the cutting off of the sides, scanning is moving what you see within that cut image). Letterboxing added the black bars to make the image rectangular again thus allowing you to see everything the filmmakers wanted you to see.

I have a vivid memory of renting Innerspace and getting a little pre-movie title explaining what Letterboxing was. I did not understand it at all. I immediately noticed the black bars though. Me and mom complained about it heavily. But also, it did seem to make the movie look better somehow, more cinematic. Sometime later I watched The Empire Strikes Back in letterbox and I was hooked. I became a lifelong champion of the format. Nowadays pretty much everything is Letterboxd, even are TVs are formatted that way.

Anyway, when we plugged in Innerspace this past weekend that’s what I thought about.

Also, it is a pretty fun movie. It is some basic 1980s science fiction cheese but it has a good performance from Dennis Quaid and a hilarious one from Martin Short. And the special effects still hold up quite well.

Quaid plays Lt. Tuck Pendleton a great pilot whose also a bit of a hotshot and alcoholic. He volunteers for a special mission in which he’ll be shrunk down to the size of a pin head and injected into a rabbit. For science you understand.

Short plays Jack Putter a hypochondriac grocery store clerk. For *reasons* Tuck is injected into Putter’s body instead of the rabbit. Our heroes have to find a way of getting him out before his air runs out. Also, some bad guys want the machine Tuck uses to fly around inside Putter’s body.

The film is basically one long excuse to show off some cool effects of this little machine zooming around the inside of a body. Like I said they do hold up. I’m a sucker for classic practical effects. It also allows Short to show off his physical comedy. With the little ship zooming through is bloodstream and the like he has to make all kinds of animated reactions and he’s a master at that stuff.

The rest of the film is just silly 1980s action stuff and isn’t worth mentioning. Meg Ryan is always worth mentioning. She’s Tuck’s girlfriend but isn’t given much more to do than that.

I’ll always remember Innerspace for turning me onto the Letterbox format, but it is worth checking out all on its own.

Chungking Express is the New Blu-ray Pick of the Week

chungkind express

Wong Kar-wai is one of those directors who is beloved by cinephiles (the Criterion Collection gave him an entire boxed set a few years ago) but who I’ve not really given his due. I’ve only seen three of his films. I loved two of them – Fallen Angels and Chungking Express, and was indifferent about the third – My Blueberry Nights. To be fair that last one was most people were indifferent about. I watched it because it starred Norah Jones whom I love. At the time I had no idea who Wong Kar-wai was.

But Chungking Express is fantastic. It explores the interconnected relationships between four random people living in a city of some seven million people. It has style to spare and loads of heart.

Criterion is giving it a 4K upgrade and I’m making it my pick of the week. With an asterix. That boxed set still looks really great, and I’m not sure this would be worth the upgrade if you already own it. I don’t but I’ll still probably save my money and buy it someday rather than this upgrade.

Also out this week that looks interesting:

Batman Ninja Vs Yakuza League: I love me some alternative Batman stories. There have been a few movies with Batman as a ninja and this one turns the Justice League into Yakuzas.

Sands of Iwo Jima 4K UHD: I’ve never seen any of the John Wayne WWII movies. I’ve always heard they were pretty bad, but I’d still like to give them a shot as I love his westerns.

Donovan’s Reef 4K UHD: This John Wayne films reminds me a bit of Hatari! in that it isn’t a western, it is set in an exotic location and its pretty light on plot but heavy on charm. It helps that it also stars Lee Marvin and the two of them are living happy bachelor lives in the South Seas until a pretty girl from Boston shows up.

The Good German 4K UHD: This Steven Soderberg take on Casablanca got terrible reviews when it came out but time seems to have improved people’s takes on it. I’m a big fan of the director but never got around to it, so now seems like the perfect opportunity.

The Eel: Radiance Films presents this Japanese film about a man who kills his wife when he finds her sleeping with another man. After a prison stint he returns home and tries to live a normal life. Complications ensue.

Heart Eyes: Modern slasher about a Valentine’s Day killer.

King of New York 4K UHD: Christopher Walken stars in this crime saga from Abel Ferrara. I watched it ages ago and wasn’t impressed but a lot of people I like like it so I may have to give it another go.

The Awesome ’80s in April: Flashdance (1983)

image host

I suppose everyone of a certain age knows that scene in Flashdance. If you are of that age then you are already picturing it – Jennifer Beals on a stage in a skimpy outfit. She’s backlit so you can’t see her features but produces a lovely profile. She dances seductively as water pours down from above creating a splash dance if you will (and you probably shouldn’t).

It is an iconic moment, one that is embedded into my memory from my growing pubescent brain. Yet I’d never seen the movie until this past week. I was surprised to learn that scene comes very early in the film. There will be more dances, some of them more creative but none as sexy or iconic.

She plays Alexandra Owens a welder by day (which gives us plenty of actually very well lit scenes in which she sweats while sparks fly all around her) and a dancer by night.

She dances in a club inhabited by guys who wear trucker caps and drink Budweiser but who watch attentively as she does arthouse dances and never complain that she doesn’t bother to take her clothes off.

She likes dancing at the club but what she really wants to be is a ballet dancer. She has an elderly mentor who encourages her to apply at the prestigious dance academy but she’s intimidated by it as she’s a working class girl.

Her boss at the welding factory is twice her age and, again, her boss, takes a shine to her. At first she lets him know he’s twice her age and her boss and that’s definitely not appropriate, but naturally they wind up a thing anyway.

She’s also got a sister who is an ice skater, and a grumpy Dad. There is a lot going on in this film but none of it really adds up to anything. We never get to know any of the characters and there isn’t much in the way of development or tension or plot. Mostly it is an excuse for a lot of big dance numbers. To be fair those are quite enjoyable and they are set to some great 1980s pop music.

It was directed by Adrian Lynne who’d also direct 9 1/2 Weeks and Fatal Attraction and produced by Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer (their first of many collaborations including Top Gun, Beverly Hills Cop, and The Rock) and that completely tracks as it has that beautiful sheen but empty center.

If you can turn off your brain and enjoy some sugary candy then this is an enjoyable distraction. But if you are looking for something more I’d look elsewhere.

The Friday Night Horror Movie – Awesome ’80s in April Addition: Dolls (1987)

image host

Stuart Gordon directed Re-Animator (1985) and for that he will have my eternal gratitude. That film, along with Evil Dead II (1987) opened my eyes to gonzo horror that mixed crazy violence with comedy and gore, and my life was forever changed.

But while I absolutely adore Re-Animator I’ve never really taken to any of the other Stuart Gordon films I’ve seen. Dolls, his third feature film as a director, did not change that.

Dolls is part of an unrelated series of films about childhood toys that come to life that for some reason were very popular in the late 1980s. The special effects work with the puppets here is a lot of fun, but it comes in very late in the film, and unfortunately the build-up is a bit of a slog.

An obnoxious married couple with a precocious young daughter get stuck in a thunderstorm. A couple of punk girls are hitch-hiking nearby and are picked up by a doofus salesman. They too are trapped by the storm. All of these disparate people make their way into a strange old mansion where they are greeted by a kindly old couple.

Most of the characters are highly unlikable. The punks are petty thieves, and well, punks. The married couple constantly complain and are ridiculously mean to the little girl. The old couple are pleasant enough but of course they are in control of the killers dolls. What’s left is the salesman who is dumb and goofy and the precocious girl.

Naturally, the killer dolls kill the annoying characters first leaving the salesman and the girl to survive the night. Presumably creating and working the puppets was expensive so most of the film they are completely off screen. They don’t really appear until nearly 45 minutes into this 77 minute film. Once they do appear things become a lot of fun, but that’s a long 45 minutes where nothing much interesting happens before then.

I’ll argue that it is worth watching for those dolls. My wife is a doll collector and while she leans heavily into the Barbie world and these are more of the porcelain variety I still got a kick out of watching how they brought them to life (and then found creative ways to destroy them). I’m a huge fan of practical effects and they are well done here.

I just wish their was a better script that moved around the effects.

Naked Alibi (1954) Blu-ray Review

naked alibi bluray

In my review of Naked Alibi which was written for Cinema Sentries back in 2019 I noted that Gloria Grahame was “…one of those actresses I’ve seen in numerous films, but never remember. Whenever she appears in a movie I’m watching, I’m always glad because I know it is going to be a good performance. But then when it’s over I forget who she is. After watching her in this, I think she’ll stick.”

She absolutely did stick. She’s one of the great femme fatales of film noir history and I’m a huge fan.

This film is a good one too, you can read my full review here.

Some Like It Hot Is The 4K UHD Pick of the Week

image host

It is a nice week in new releases. There is a very cool looking set of French thrillers from Radiance Films, a new Film Noir boxed set from Kino Lorber (I’ll have that review ready later this week) a ridiculous 1980s slasher in UHD, a very fun Gena Davis/Samuel L. Jackson thriller and of course one of the funniest movies ever made gettting the HD Criterion treatment.. Click here to see all the info you need.

The Awesome ’80s in April: Highlander (1986)

image host

More so than with any of my other themes, I find that I wind up talking about my experience with the movies during Awesome 80s in April rather than reviewing them. I grew up in the 1980s. I watched a lot of movies during that decade and continued to watch them on home video through the 1990s and beyond. More than any other decade, I have watched movies from the 1980s.

I also remember hearing about a lot of the movies in the 1980s. I remember watching trailers growing up, or hearing about films from Siskel and Ebert, reading reviews in the local paper, etc. These things are implanted in my memory, even for movies I’ve never seen.

So when I watch them now, those memories linger. You’ll find that in these reviews I’ll spend a lot of time talking about watching them as a kid, or at least knowing about them in some way. Sometimes it will be just a memory of seeing the VHS cover a thousand times while browsing for something else to watch.

So it was with Highlander. I didn’t watch the film when it came out in 1986. I was too young. I didn’t watch it in high school or even college. But I was very aware of it. In this case I don’t remember watching trailers or hearing buzz about it as a kid. But later people talked about it being one of the great fantasy movies of all time.

When I finally did see it, probably twenty years ago or so, I was disappointed in it. I didn’t really like it, and I didn’t understand why people loved it so.

Watching it again now, I both understand the hype and my trepidation over it. It has a cool concept. Some great music. Some beautiful shots. A wonderfully ridiculous performance from Clancy Brown. But Christopher Lambert in the lead doesn’t work for me. The mythology isn’t fleshed out very well. And the staging of most of the action is just bad.

The Highlander is Connor MacLeod (Lambert), an immortal living a simple life as an antiques dealer in New York in 1985. Our film begins with him watching a wrestling match in Madison Square Garden. Bored, he leaves before the match is over only to be attacked by some rando in the parking garage. They fight with swords, and MacLeod beheads the other dude.

Flashback to the Scottish Highlands in the 1500s, and MacLeod is living a simple life as a farmer or whatever Scottish villagers were in the 1500s. His clan fights another clan. The Kurgan (Brown) is another immortal, but he is a badass and evil. He’s fighting for the other clan. But really he just wants to kill MacLeod because when one immortal beheads the other, he gains the dead guy’s powers or something.

Kurgan gives MacLeod a good stabbing but is unable to behead him. The thing is, MacLeod at this time doesn’t  know he’s immortal. Nor do any of his clan. They have a funeral and everything. But then MacLeod wakes up, definitely not dead, and freaks everybody out.

He’s banished and eventually meets Juan Sánchez-Villalobos Ramírez (Sean Connery), a good guy immortal who teaches McLeod in the immortal ways of living, fighting, and not dying.

There are a bunch of immortals on Earth, and the only way to kill them is beheading. Every once in a while these guys get a tingling, and that means they gotta come together and try to kill each other. Someday there will be a great tingling and everybody will gather together and fight until there is only one immortal standing. That guy will get all the power and become God or something. They very much like saying “There Can Be Only One” right before they try and kill each other. It is unclear why they need to kill each other. They don’t always, as MacLeod and Ramírez become friends. And later MacLeod will hang out with another immortal, and they definitely don’t try and kill each other. So maybe it’s just the evil guy who likes killing.

It is all kind of vague and nonsensical if you ask me. I don’t think the writers spent a lot of time working the details of the mythology out. There are sequels and a TV show, so maybe it makes more sense later on.

The film moves back and forth between the 1980s, where MacLeod has to fight the Kurgan again, but he also makes a lady friend and deals with the police over the decapitated dead guy from the garage, and the past, where he gets all his training and stuff.

The film looks great. The Scottish scenery is stunningly beautiful, and cinematographer Gerry Fisher gives the modern stuff a cool noirish feel with lots of shadows, backlighting, and fluid camera movement.

Christopher Lambert is stiff as MacLeod, never making me believe anything that happens to him. But Clancy Brown is clearly having a lot of fun while Sean Connery does his best Sean Connery. He’s playing an Egyptian who has been living as a Spaniard, but he’s still got Connery’s very Scottish accent. I’ll take that over Lamber’s attempt at Scottish. In the modern scenes he’s doing something like German for some reason.

The fight scenes are poorly choreographed and terribly shot. It is hard to believe the same crew who creates such interesting images in all the other scenes managed to screw up the many fight scenes so badly. But here we are.

But that Queen soundtrack rocks.

So what we’re left with is an interesting mythology poorly told and some very pretty images. That’s enough to make me recommend it, but not enough to make me want to dive into the sequels.

The Totally Awesome ’80s in April: 2025 Edition

princess bride movie poster

I feel like I’ve been a bit remiss in my movie theme watching (and writing) this year. I don’t know why exactly except that I’ve been busy. Busy with work. Busy with family stuff. Busy watching (and writing) about movies for Cinema Sentries. I thought that giving up on my music blog would give me more time to write for this one. And it has to an extent, but I seem to be posting more about things that aren’t a part of the month’s them than are.

It is also difficult to get into that groove. For so long I posted music everyday it had become a habit. I’m still working on making this blog a habit.

Which brings us to the Totally Awesome ’80s in April. This will be my third year with this theme and I’m excited about it. Historically I do really well with it. Since it tackles an entire decade and not a specific genre it is much easier to find movies to watch. I especially love the 1980s because I grew up in that decade and have a ton of memories watching movies as a kid, but also because there are a ton of movies geared towards adults that I didn’t watch.

It has been really fun to dive into a lot of those movies these last two years and watch films that would not have interested me as a pre-teen.

I’ve already watched three movies from the 1980s this weekend and I should have some reviews posted this coming week.

Now that’s what I call awesome.

The Friday Night Horror Movie: Companion (2025)

image host

I sometimes think about how a movie’s marketing is at odds with the movie they are supposed to be supporting. It is a common complaint that movie trailers spoil the movies. Most trailers do seem to give away too much plot, and sometimes they will give away a film’s big twist.

But I also think about the ways in which filmmakers make movies with tension and twists. When watching a thriller you pretty much know that the hero isn’t going to die and yet movies often ratchet up the tension making you “believe” that they will. Other times a movie will be about something – something they have to know will be revealed in the marketing as it is central to the reason anyone would want to watch it – yet they will dole it out like a big reveal.

Companion is like that. And it is here that I have to say *spoilers ahead* I guess.

The main character in Companion is a robot, or a “fuck bot” as one character calls her. She is a lifelike android programmed for love and sex. Her name is Iris and she’s wonderfully played by Sophie Thatcher.

If you’ve seen a trailer for the movie then you know this. If you have read even the most basic synopsis of the film you know this. Hell, if you have seen the poster for the film you probably know this.

It isn’t really even a big twist. It isn’t like Alien where the reveal of a character being an android changes everything. Iris being a robotic companion is kind of central to the entire film.

And yet for the first twenty minutes or so the film makes out like she’s real. We see her and her boyfriend/owner Josh (Jack Quaid) hold hands and talk sweet. We see her memories of their meet cute. She’s nervous about spending the weekend with his friends, afraid they won’t like her. Etc. It seems like they are a real couple, like she is a real human. But also something is off. The filmmaking has an ominous tone. At least one character makes a winking comment about who she really is.

And then they reveal she’s a robot as if it is a bit surprise.

This isn’t really a complaint. I don’t mind the way they rolled out that reveal and if you managed to see the film completely blind it might be a fun surprise. I just find that kind of thing fascinating from a marketing point of view as it would be difficult to make a trailer of this film without spoiling that aspect of it.

There are other surpsrises in store for the audience later in the film. Ones I found quite interesting and won’t spoil. Let’s just say things turn a bit dark and violent.

Using a female companion robot as a way to discuss misogyny isn’t new. I was reminded of last year’s Subservience quite a lot with this film. Companion doesn’t have anything particularly interesting to say about the subject either.

Yet I still quite enjoyed the film. It has that slick quality a lot of modern horror films have. It feels pre-packaged in a way, like it was built by a corporation and not a filmmaker with a singular vision. It is very well made. The acting is good. The script does a nice job of balancing the horror, the action, and the comedy. The characters all seem sort of self aware and say things like “You’re an emotional support robot that fucks.” and Josh’s pet name for Iris is Beep Boop.

I enjoyed myself, but in a week I’ll struggle to recall anything about it.