The Friday Night Horror Movie: Demon City Shinjuku (1988)

poster

One of the things I love about doing these monthly movie themes is that it not only allows me to watch movies I might not otherwise watch, but it gives me a greater understanding of the history of cinema. I learn things I might not otherwise come to know.

For example for Animation in August I’ve watched several Japanese animated movies and this has brought to my knowledge banks the term OVA or Original Video Animation. That’s basically a Japanese version of straight-to-video applied specifically to animation.

Like straight-to-video releases OVAs had more freedom than their cinematic or televised productions had in terms of length and mature content. An OVA could be as long as it needed to be and they were allowed more freedom in the amount of violence, adult language, and sex/nudity they could use.

Demon City Shinjuku is an OVA adapted from a novel of the same name. It follows a reluctant hero’s journey into the heart of Tokyo which has been overrun by demons.

It has more than a passing similarity to Star Wars, with some terrific animation, and some pretty cool demon designs. But it suffers from some terrible writing (or possibly a very bad translation).

In a prologue, we learn that an evil dude called Rebi Ra has allowed himself to become possessed so that he can wreak evil havoc upon the world. A good dude called Genichirou tries to stop him but is killed in the process. A giant earthquake happens during their battle wrecking the Shinjuku part of Tokyo. Demons quickly take over this area.

Ten years later Genichirou’s son, Kyoya Izayoi is tasked with going into the city and destroying Rebi Ra. He is accompanied by Sayaka Rama the daughter of the World President who has just been kidnapped by Rebi Ra. If they fail Rebi Ra will unleash all the demons and conquer the world.

Along the way, they obtain help from a short rollerblader who is just out for himself but ultimately finds his soul and a Dracula-esque mysterious goth dude. There is also Aguni Rai an ancient mystic who periodically offers advice.

They come across several demons before ultimately fighting Rebi Ra. There is a crab-like creature with a human head and a giant mouth full of teeth in its torso and a sexy redhead with tentacle arms.

All of this is pretty good. I enjoyed it. But the dialogue is rotten. Generally speaking, I watch foreign language films in their original language. I much prefer hearing the original actors’ voices even if I don’t actually understand what they are saying. With animation, I am a little more lenient since there is a realization that all actors are dubbing in their lines (it helps that most of the foreign language animated films I’ve seen are dubbed by really good English-speaking actors).

I started watching this film in the original Japanese with English subtitles, but something was wrong with the audio causing none of the film’s score or non-verbal noises to be heard. So I had to switch to the English language dub. It was…not good. And strange at times. The male characters were all very horny and they dropped F-bombs on a regular basis. I’m not necessarily opposed to either of those things but they often seemed out of place in this film.

For example, one night Kyoya Izayoi and Sayaka Rama find themselves in the same bedroom for the night. After Syaka goes to sleep Kyoya begins to look at her longingly. The camera slowly pans down her body so clearly some of this is in the original script, but in English, he goes on and on about how he wants to sleep with her.

And his dialogue is loaded with F-bombs in the oddest of places. He’ll throw one in the middle of an otherwise innocuous sentence. So much of it felt like some American scriptwriter trying to make the script more edgy.

It was bad enough that I turned on the subtitles just to compare. Gone was the hard-core cursing, but also quite a bit of the dialogue was tweaked to give it different meanings. It wasn’t the case of just some minor word changes, but entire sentences would be different. I think the gist was still there but it was clear the dialogue was translated with some different intentions than the subtitles. I also noticed there were times when the character’s mouth wasn’t moving, the subtitles weren’t indicating anything was being said, but the voice actors were talking. At first, I thought it was an internal monologue but now I think it was just the English language track adding in additional dialogue. There is a scene at the end where our two heroes are looking at each other longingly and then they kiss. His mouth doesn’t move, and there is no subtitle, but the English track has him thinking something really cheesy about how beautiful she is.

That’s far too many paragraphs of me discussing this film’s audio track. I don’t know what it all means. I just found it weird and distracting.

So, I recommend the film, but definitely try and find the original Japanese audio.

The Who – East Rutherford, NJ (10/10/82)

The Who
Brendan Byrne Arena
East Rutherford, NJ, USA
10th October 1982

New Jersey Soundboard

Disc 1
1.Intro.
2.My Generation
3.I Can’t Explain
4.Dangerous
5. Sister Disco
6.The Quiet One
7. It’s Hard
8. Eminence Front
9. Behind Blue Eyes
10. Baba O’Riley
11. Drowned
12. Athena
13. Cry If You Want

Disc 2

  1. Audience
  2. Who Are You
  3. Pinball Wizard
  4. See Me, Feel Me
  5. 5:15
  6. Love, Reign O’er Me
  7. Long Live Rock
  8. Substitute
  9. Won’t Get Fooled Again
  10. Summertime Blues
  11. Twist and Shout

Animation in August: A Scanner Darkly (2006)

cover

I am a fan of Richard Linklater. I love Slackers and Dazed and Confused. School of Rock is a great deal of fun. I’ve never read anything by Phillip K. Dick but I’ve dug some cinematic adaptations of his work such as Blade Runner and Minority Report. A Richard Linklater adaptation of a Phillip K. Dick story should be right up my alley.

And it is. When A Scanner Darkly came out in 2006 I was excited by it. Especially since it starred Keanu Reeves, Robert Downey, Jr., Woody Harrelson, and Winona Ryder – all actors I quite enjoy.

But I didn’t watch it in the theater. I made a copy of it from the library or a friend. Or maybe I taped it off the TV. Anyway, I’ve had a copy of it in my house for over a decade. Still, I only just now watched it.

I don’t know why exactly. Like I say it should be right up my alley. I think I even started it once or twice, but never got very far. Part of the problem is the animation style. It uses a technique called interpolated rotoscope which is where they shoot it live action, using real actors on real sets and animators trace over the footage frame by frame. The results are this weird mix of realistic with a wobbly psychedelia.

I don’t like it. My mind can’t seem to process it correctly. Like it thinks it is real, but then the wobbly animation throw it off and I don’t know how to comprehend what is happening. Or something. I find it difficult to watch.

So I kept turning it off. But this time I powered through and found a quite interesting story and an entertaining movie.

Set in the near future where America has essentially lost the drug war. Substance D, a powerful hallucinagen has addicted some twenty percent of the population. The govenrment has developed a high tech survelleince system and a large network of undercover agents to combat this.

Bob Arctor (Keanu Reeves) is an undercover agent who has also become addicted to Substance D. At times he doesn’t even realize he is a police officer. He lives in a rundown house with a couple of drug buddies – James (Robert Downey, Jr.) and Ernie (Woody Harrelson). His sort-of girl friend Donna (Winona Ryder) often stops by.

A large part of the plot is basically a hang out movie where we just sit around with these four people as they talk, get high, drive around, and futz about. The conversations are rambling and conspiratorial. And quite funny. These scenes are very reminiscent of several Linklater films, but especially Slackers, where the camera just wandered around Austin, Texas jumping from one oddball character to the next without much sense of a plot.

Sometimes Arctor goes to police headquarters where he dons a scramble suit which constantly changes every aspect of his appearance and voice. This protects his identity from everybody. His bosses get the idea that Arctor (who they do not know is actually their agent) is one of the drug dealers in the area and as such they ask “Fred” (the name they know him by) to enhance his survellaince on Arctor.

The plot does ramp up a bit by the end and it concludes in a fascinating way. There is some interesting commentary on the drug way, and our ever growing surveillance stage. But mostly its just an entertaing film where some great actors hang out and act paranoid.

I still wish it used a differnt animation style.

Bill & Ted’s Most Trimphunt Trilogy Is the New Blu-ray Pick of the Week

boxart

I’m back on the new Blu-ray release beat. I mean I never really left it as I’ve continued to write these posts for Cinema Sentries but I’m gonna do better at posting them here. Since I only write them for CS every other week I’m also gonna try to do the odd weeks just for here.

This week was strangely a lousy week for new releases. There are only a handful of films coming out and most of them are either so obscure I’ve never heard of them or not all that interesting to me.

But I love Bill & Ted so I picked them.

Demons (1985) & Demons 2 (1986)

bluray

It occurs to me that having moved all my music posts to the other site, I’m going to need to figure out ways to post to this site on a regular basis. I was posting music every day and then occasionally talking about movies and such like. But without the music, this place is gonna look a little barren.

I’m hoping to step up my game a little. An easy way to do that is to keep going through my Cinema Sentries posts and linking to them here.

First up are a couple of “classic” Lamberto Bava horror flicks. I recently upgraded my Blu-ray player to a 4K UHD one and these were the first films I watched on it.

The films are ridiculous, and bonkers, and so, so much fun.

You can read my review here.

Animation in August: Song of the Sea (2014)

poster

Song of the Sea is the second part of an Irish Folklore Trilogy from director Tomm Moore (the first being The Secret of Kells, and the last Wolfwalkers). I’ve seen The Secret of Kells and like it I found the animation in Song of the Sea to be gorgeous, and the folklore fascinating, but the actual story somewhat lacking. There is just some part of these films that I cannot connect to. I don’t know why.

Set in the early 1980s Song of the Sea follows a young boy, Ben (David Rawle), and his younger sister Saoirse (Lucy O’Connell). They live in a lighthouse on a small island off the coast of Ireland. Their mother died while giving birth so Saoirse and their Dad (Brendan Gleeson) still mourns for her. Deeply. So much so that he struggles to be a parent for his two children.

One night, on her birthday, Saoirse runs into the sea and swims with some seals. Though the family doesn’t know it, she is a selkie (a mythological creature that can shapeshift between human and seal). Her Granny (Fionnula Flanagan) finds Saoirse in the sea and thinks she’s about to drown. She nags Dad into letting her take the children to her place on the mainland.

Naturally, the two kids decide they must return home and sneak away in the night. But Saoirse is fully turning into a selkie and as such she needs her coat to survive. Her coat that her father took from her and threw into the sea.

The two have a mighty adventure getting home, running into fairies, the Great Seanachaí (an ancient storyteller with hair as long as the world), and a mean old owl witch.

The story is fine. It is a classic adventure. It is told well, but again there is something about it I don’t connect to. I don’t know if it is these kids, or maybe I have trouble with the mythology here. It definitely isn’t explained thoroughly, you are just sort of left to understand who these creatures are. But I’ve enjoyed other fantasy stories with deep myths. So I don’t know.

The animation is spectacular. It uses a mix of hand-drawn and computer-generated art. The backgrounds are super detailed but also look like sets on a stage. Nothing is realistic looking but drawn in a unique and imaginative way. Each frame is astonishingly beautiful.

I absolutely recommend it. I know many will connect to the story in a way that I don’t. Even though I didn’t it is still a lovely bit of animation.

Animation in August: Batman: Year One (2011)

poster

Frank Miller and David Mazzucchelli’s Batman: Year One comic from 1987 is one of the greatest comic book stories of all time. It traces Bruce Wayne’s transformation into the vigilante known as Batman while simultaneously tracing Jim Gordon’s first year policing in Gotham.

It partially inspired Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins (2005) and has influenced countless comics since it was published.

For well over a decade DC has been creating straight-to-video animated movies that are adapted from some of their best and well-known comics (or periodically are original creations). I’ve seen a few and I mostly like them. They often involve A-list actors and creators and exist somewhere between what you’d normally think of as a straight-to-video release and true made-for-the-theater cinematic experience.

It has been far too long since I read the comic, so I can’t say how closely this adaptation follows the story, but from what I’ve read online it does indeed follow it closely. Perhaps too closely. A good adaption needs to let go of the source material in some ways so that it can allow cinema’s strengths to shine through.

Bruce Wayne (Ben McKenzie) returns to Gotham City after a 12-year absence. He’s still mourning the loss of his parents and his one goal is to enact the type of justice the police force seems incapable of granting.

Police Lieutenant Jim Gordon (Bryan Cranston) has just transferred to Gotham. He left his last post because he dared to take down a corrupt cop and the rest of the police force shunned him for it. Gotham Police isn’t just a place with a few bad apples. It has a basket full of them. Hell, the entire tree is corrupt from top to bottom. Police Commissioner Loeb (Jon Polito) is openly corrupt.

The film follows Bruce Wayne as he becomes Batman and fights crime in Gotham, while Gordon battles corruption on the police force.

It is pretty good. Again my memory of the book is too fuzzy to really compare, but I do know I loved the book and I didn’t love this. It is a fine story told well. Cranston especially is good as Gordon. The animation is fine. The action sequences are well-developed. But it never wowed me. I’d never recommend this over the comic.

Animation in August: Vampire Hunter D (1985)

poster

This is one of those films I thought I had seen. I remember hearing about in college or thereabouts. It generated some buzz because it was a very adult animated film with lots of sex and violence. That seemed very unusual to me at the time. I have a vague memory of renting it and watching it, but no actual memories of what the film was about. Watching it yesterday brought back no memories whatsoever.

Which is good as had I remembered any part of it I would not have watched it again. Vampire Hunter D is a bad film. It is poorly animated, the writing is awful. It takes what could be a cool concept and absolutely does nothing with it.

A young woman, Doris Lang, is attacked by Count Mangus Lee, a 10,000-year-old vampire while taking a walk . He lets her go but within a few days, she will turn into a vampire and be forced to marry the Count.

She hires our titular vampire hunter to help kill Count Lee and thus be freed from his spell. D is a human/vampire hybrid (or a Dhampir if you will), his mother having been seduced by a powerful vampire many years ago. He’s also got a symbiote living in his hand. It has a mouth and is quite chatty. It reminded me of the silly animal sidekicks in Disney movies.

He’s super powerful. He agrees to help Doris. He goes on a quest to defeat the Count, encountering a number of grotesque magical creatures along the way. This includes the three sisters – siren-like creatures who turn into snakes and suck the life force out of anyone. There’s also the Count’s son and daughter who are conniving, scheming, and totally at odds with one another. He wants to usurp the Count, she thinks his desire to marry a commoner is ill-advised.

I love a good quest story and there are some interesting ideas here. It is based upon a series of books by Hideyuki Kikuchi and it has that feeling of containing a deep mythology, but the movie botches pretty much all of it.

The biggest failure of the movie lies in the animation. It looks cheap. It looks like those cartoons I used to watch on television after school. Think GI Joe or He-Man and the Masters of the Universe. Some of the character concepts are interesting – especially that of D who is fitted with a good hat and long cape – but the animation looks sloppy. During action scenes the characters strike a pose while the background turns into a generic set of constantly moving lines. It is meant to denote movement and action, but really it just looks like an easy way for the animators to save a little time and money. Any sense of location and actual movement is lost.

In 2000 they released a sort-of sequel, Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust. From the trailers, the animation looks much improved. I dig vampires and vampire hunters/slayers so I might give it a shot. It surely will be an improvement over this garbage.

Animation in August

poster

As a kid, like all kids, I suppose I loved animated movies, or cartoons as we called them back then. I grew up in the 1980s so my memories are filled with the films of Rankin Bass and Disney, though I was slightly too old to have enjoyed the Disney renaissance of the 1990s as they came into theaters. Later I fell in love with Pixar and then Studio Ghibli. I am a fan of animation, though not a superfan. So I thought it would be fun this month to watch a bunch of animated films.

One of the great things about animation is that it is a type of filmmaking, not a genre. It comes in all shapes, sizes, and genres. There are animated films for kids and adults, there are funny films and sad films, scary films and exciting films. They can be hand drawn or computer-generated, and they come in all kinds of styles.

While I will no doubt watch some Disney films and Ghibli movies, my goal is to dig a little deeper into the well and find some lesser-known movies. I want to watch the films animated geeks go on and on about but that the general crowds don’t know about.

With that in mind if you have any recommendations I’d love to hear them.