Comments

Is anyone having difficulty leaving a comment? I’m having trouble leaving comments and it is my bloody site. When I go to my site and try to leave a comment I can type it out, but when I go to hit reply the button turns a light shade and then does nothing.

To actually leave a comment I have to either log into my control panel, or I can bring up a private browser, write my comment where it will then ask me to log in and then I post the comment.

I don’t know if I’ve just got some wonky settings on my browser or if this is happening to other people.

I guess if you can’t leave a comment send me an e-mail: brewcritic@gmail.com.

If people are having trouble then I’d like to figure out why and fix it.

The Friday Night Horror Movie: 10 Cloverfield Lane (2016)

10 cloverfield lane poster

The MCU has ruined cinema in so many ways. I mean I’m a fan of many of their films but the way that they essentially steamrolled Hollywood has created numerous problems. Listen to Martin Scorsese for the details, but one of those issues was that it made every movie try to become part of its own cinematic universe.

10 Cloverfield Lane is the perfect example of this. Cloverfield was a JJ Abrams film in which…actually, you know what? I’m not going to spoil what Cloverfield was about. If you haven’t seen that film, if you haven’t even heard of it then I’m gonna let you exist in ignorance. It isn’t a bad film, but staying in the dark on that film is a very good thing when it comes to watching this one.

10 Cloverfield Lane is a movie that was developed on its own. It was only later when they actually moved forward into the process of making it that they decided to make it part of the Cloverfield Cinematic Universe and tacked on an ending to fit that sequence, and well, that was a dumb idea.

Anyway, Mary Elizabeth Winstead stars as Michelle, a woman who as the film begins is running away from her fiancé. They’ve had a fight and she can’t handle it.

Out on the road, in the middle of nowhere Louisiana, she has a terrible accident that renders her unconscious. Sometime later she awakes inside a bare, cinderblock bunker. There is an IV connected to her arm and a brace connected to her leg. She’s also chained to the wall. Terrified she tries to escape, but to no avail.

Then in walks a massive, hulking man. His name is Howard (John Goodman). He tells her she can’t escape, tosses her a key to her chains, and then shuts and locks the door. Eventually, he lets her out and shows her around his rather large, and fully accommodated underground bunker. He tells her a story about how he rescued her from that car wreck and brought her down there to escape…something. Something bad. An attack of some sort. He thinks it was Russians or possibly aliens but they’ve made the air poisonous. Only they survived and they are stuck down there for at least a year.

The they also includes Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.) Howard’s neighbor who helped build the bunker and is a believer in the invasion story. He saw it with his own eyes. Michelle is skeptical. Howard is clearly unstable. One minute he’s a kindly, country farmer, the next he’s grabbing onto her shoulders and screaming. He built this bunker expecting something terrible and now he’s imagined it.

The screenplay wavers. There are moments when it seems as if Howard is crazy, that the outside terrors are just his imagination. And then a moment later we’ll see something that makes us believe. As the film moves forward Michelle begins to realize that the horrors inside might just be worse than the horrors outside.

It is an incredibly well-constructed, tension-filled, little horror-thriller. I love films that are set entirely inside a single setting and the bunker is a fantastic place for this movie. It is small and claustrophobic while still having enough rooms and crannies to keep things interesting. The film twists and turns in the most fascinating ways. When she first finds herself chained up in that little room we expect the worst. We expect what horror movies usually give us in those scenarios. But the film doesn’t give us that, it gives us something else.

The ending does tie itself to the Cloverfield universe and I don’t really love that, but also it is surprisingly tense. Giving us an answer to the question as to what is going on outside was always going to be a letdown, and yet again it worked for me on a beat-for-beat cellular level. I mean it was scary.

Goodman gives an absolutely fantastic performance. I wish he’d been given more opportunities like this. Winstead and Gallagher are likewise superb. It isn’t a perfect movie, but it’s a really good one.

Noirvember: Man on the Run (1949)

man on the run

A man walks into a club and finds his old Army compatriot, Peter Burden (Derek Farr) working behind the bar. Peter is a deserter and as this is post-War England that’s a bad thing to be. The man tries to blackmail Peter so he flees. We see him doing a series of odd jobs throughout the country before, desperate, he walks into a pawn shop looking to sell his Army revolver. Just as he takes the gun out of his coat, but before he can say anything a couple of actual armed robbers come in and beat the proprietor senseless. Before he dies the proprietor gives a description of the only robber not wearing a mask – our hero Peter.

As the police close in on him, a desperate Peter busts into the home of a widow named Jean Adams (Joan Hopkins). He promises not to hurt her, but begs her to let him stay. She being kindly and perhaps a bit lonely allows him overnight. While there he tells her his story and she believes him.

Together they begin searching for the two real burglars who can set the police straight and set him free.

Man On the Run is a terrific little British Noir. It doesn’t do anything new or amazing with the genre, but what it does do it does really well. During my month of watching Great British Cinema, I fell in love with this type of film.

The Brits were great at making this kind of tidy, nuts-and-bolts thriller. I don’t mean to say that there isn’t artistry to this film, because there is. The sets are fantastic, as is the camera placement, and the lighting all has that wonderful noir shadowy thing going for it. It mostly takes place in bars, police stations, and houses which gives it a claustrophobic feel. But it’s a film that doesn’t wow you with that stuff, it isn’t overloaded with style. It is a really good story told really well.

The relationship between Peter and Jean does develop a little too quickly. It is difficult to believe that she’s gonna fall for this man who just busted into her home, clearly running from the police. But that’s the movies and I didn’t mind. Both actors are quite good in it and they do make their love as believable as it can be. The thriller aspects are tightly wound and make their plight quite exciting.

It is surprisingly sympathetic the Peter’s plight as a deserter, something that was quite contentious and in the minds of its British audience at the time. He’s served four years as a soldier but when he requests some additional time off due to family members being deathly ill, his request is denied. He takes them anyway and is considered a deserter. The film puts the moral wrestling over this type of thing in the background, but the fact that it is there at all, and that it lends sympathy to a man (and men like him) who technically deserted is interesting.

The whole thing may be a little too Hitchockian for some but I found it be be delightful all the way through.

Noirvember: The Killer Is Loose (1956)

the killer is loose poster

A bank is robbed in broad daylight. Everything about it indicates there was an inside man. Lt. Sam Wagner (Joseph Cotten) is on the case. Clues lean toward bank employee Leon Poole (Wendell Corey). When they come to his apartment to speak to him Poole shouts that he’s not coming out then shoots through the door, injuring one policeman. Wagner busts in, but with the lights out he can’t see. He sees a shadow and shoots. The victim isn’t Poole but his wife, who dies instantly. Poole is convicted and vows revenge.

For two years Poole is a model prisoner and he’s sent to a work camp with less security. When he’s asked to accompany a guard to go into town to help pick up a few things he sees his opportunity. He kills the guard and escapes. But it isn’t Sam Wagner he’s after, it’s his wife Lila (Rhonda Fleming) he wants to kill. An eye for an eye, or rather a wife for a wife is his feeling.

Director Budd Boetticher filmed The Killer is Loose in 15 days. In some ways, you can feel that time (and budget) constraint on screen. It often feels like a made-for-television movie. But in all the ways that count, the film is excellent.

I’ve seen quite a few of Boetticher’s films (including all five in the Ranown Cycle he made with Randolph Scott) and I’ve enjoyed them all. He wasn’t a flashy or even stylish director, but he knew how to get the most out of his limited resources. He was a master of efficiency and that’s certainly true here.

I’m very much a fan of Joseph Cotten as well, and he falls right in step with what Boetticher was going for. His performance is perfect, not flashy. It doesn’t draw attention to itself, it’s just a good performance by an absolute pro.

But it is Wendell Corey who catches my attention. He’s not showy, either, but he plays Poole like a wounded animal. There is a scene early on at the bank where his former Sergeant (John Larch) bumps into him. It seems Poole wasn’t much of a soldier and his Sergeant made fun of him ruthlessly. Later, while holding the Sergeant’s wife (Dee J. Thompson) hostage, he tells her that everyone has always made fun of him. Except his wife. In that moment we understand what he’s doing. It isn’t that the film exempts or forgives Poole of his murderous revenge, but the script and Corey’s performance make us understand, even sympathize to some extent.

Naturally, I always want all my films to be masterpieces, but if I can’t have that then I’ll take a solidly built, professionally created film every time. This is exactly that.

Backdraft (1991)

backdraft blu

Sometimes I’ll watch a movie that I had seen years ago, when I was a teenager or in college, or whatever. Sometimes it is a movie that I didn’t like that much but I want to revisit to see if my feelings have changed. Sometimes they do, and I’m glad I watched it again. Sometimes they don’t and I realize my feelings were right all along.

Backdraft falls into the latter category. I didn’t like it when it came out, and I don’t like it now. It does, however, have some spectacular effects, and ones that are not CGI which makes it even better.

You can read my full review here.

White Lightning (1973) & Gator (1976)

burt reynolds blurays

Burt Reynolds was one of those actors whose name I knew growing up because he was a huge star, a household name you might say. But I never saw very many of his films. I think I actually knew him more from that old gameshow he developed Win, Lose, Or Draw than any of his movies.

I think I first really noticed him in a film while watching Boogie Nights the P.T. Anderson film about the porn industry. He was great in that and it became something of a comeback film for the aging star. But over the last few years, I’ve been catching up with his films from the 1970s and 1980s. What has surprised me is that Reynolds is actually a very good actor. I’d always figured he was just an attractive sex symbol who made silly little action/comedies. I mean he was an attractive actor who made a lot of silly little action/comedies, but he had some chops, too.

Anyway, I watched and reviewed White Lightning and its sequel Gator a few weeks back. They are fun little Southern actioners with more heart than you’d expect. You can read my full reviews by clicking on the links.

U2 – The Joshua Tree Tour, 2017

U2 was the first band I ever really loved. I grew up in the late 1980s and came of age in the early 1990s. That puts me firmly in camp Generation X. The Joshua Tree and Achtung Baby were seminal records in my life. In some ways, those two albums define Gen X for me. The Joshua Tree is rootsy, passionate, and authentic. Achtung Baby is ironic, modern, and self-aware. I loved them both.

In 2017 and then again in 2019 U2 embarked on a massive world tour in which they played the entirety of The Joshua Tree album (irritatingly, I saw them in 2018 during the Experience + Innocence Tour in which they did not play a single song off of The Joshua Tree, but I digress).

In our discussion of me trying to make connections with shows instead of just throwing things up randomly someone mentioned that a lot of bands seem to be doing this thing where they play an album in its entirety and that made me immediately think of U2 and this tour. I know I don’t post a lot of U2 shows on this site, frankly I haven’t paid a whole lot of attention to them in many years, but I thought it would be fun to post this tour.

I had initially intended to grab and post the 2019 tour as well, but they played a lot of shows in 2017 and I wanted to get this done before spending another couple of weeks grabbing those shows.

I hope you guys enjoy this. I had fun with it. There are a few shows that I’m missing, but according to U2 Start there aren’t any recordings of those shows in existence. It seems weird that no one taped their gig at Bonnarro as there always seem to be a lot of tapers at that festival, but I couldn’t find any. If you do know of any recordings from any of the missing shows I’d appreciate a link.

Leg 1: North America

2017.05.12 – Vancouver, Canada
2017.05.14 – Seattle, WA
2017.05.17 – Santa Clara, CA
2017.05.20 – Pasadena, CA
2017.05.21 – Pasadena, CA
2017.05.24 – Houston, TX
2017.05.26 – Arlington, TX – No Known Recordings Exist
2017.06.03 – Chicago, IL
2017.06.04 – Chicago, IL
2017.06.07 – Pittsburgh, PA
2017.06.09 – Manchester, TN – No Known Recordings Exist
2017.06.11 – Miami Gardens, FL
2017.06.14 – Tampa, FL
2017.06.16 – Louisville, KY
2017.06.18 – Philadelphia, PA – No Known Recordings Exist
2017.06.20 – Landover, MD
2017.06.23 – Toronto, Canada
2017.06.25 – Foxborough, MA
2017.06.28 – East Rutherford, NJ
2017.06.29 -East Rutherford, NJ
2017.07.01 – Cleveland, OH

Leg 2: Europe

2017.07.08 – London, England
2017.07.09 – London, England
2017.07.12 – Berlin, Germany
2017.07.15 – Rome, Italy
2017.07.16 – Rome, Italy
2017.07.15-16 – Rome, Italy
2017.07.18 – Barcelona, Spain
2017.07.22 – Dublin, Ireland
2017.07.25 – Saint-Denis, France
2017.07.26 – Saint-Denis, France
2017.07.29 – Amsterdam, Netherlands
2017.07.30 – Amsterdam, Netherlands
2017.08.01 – Brussels, Belgium

Noirvember: Pitfall (1948)

pitfall

John Forbes (Dick Powell) is a regular, average guy. He’s happily married to Sue (Jane Wyatt), has a loveable son, and a decent job as an insurance investigator. He should be happy, but he’s not. He’s bored. He’d like some excitement even if he doesn’t know what that looks like, and when he gets it he doesn’t know what to do with it.

Excitement comes in the form of Lizabeth Scott who plays Mona Stevens. She’s the wife of a guy who just got sent up for embezzlement. The insurance company initially covered some of the losses from that embezzlement scheme and they are looking to get some of their money back. As it turns out the crook gave his wife several gifts with the money he embezzled and the insurance company can confiscate those things to recoupe some of their losses.

John initially sends a private detective named Mac (Raymond Burr) to take a look at the case. He immediately falls in love with Monda and tells John so. John immediately takes him off the case and goes to have a look at her himself.

He likes what he sees and they have a dalliance of sorts. When Mac finds this out he gets all tough guy on John. What’s interesting here is that John goes back to his wife. He’s seen the excitement he was hoping for and it makes him realize what he’s got.

For a time. Naturally, certain events draw him back bringing it all to a surprising conclusion.

It is interesting to place this film into context. Made in 1948 this is a depiction of America just a few years into its post-war greatness. Men like John Forbes are supposed to be the very picture of contentment. He should be happy. But he’s not. Being a cog in a large machine, living a life of utter blandness has gotten to him. And yet, an exciting life filled with sex and violence isn’t the answer either. What the film does with all this is interesting.

Pitfall is one of the definitive film noirs of its period. Yet, I could never quite get into it. Maybe that’s because it is both very similar to the classic noir plot and just different enough to throw me off-kilter. Or maybe it was something else, I don’t know exactly what didn’t excite me about it.

Dick Powell is always enjoyable and I love me some Lizabeth Scott in a film noir. It is always interesting to see Raymond Burr in these old films as the heavy when I grew up watching him as Perry Mason on the television.

So it isn’t the cast that bothers me. And it isn’t a bad film by any means, just not as good as I expected from its reputation.